
From blockbuster to nichebuster
By Lucien Hordijk (editor until August 2022), Daan Marselis (editor until September 2022), | 29 July, 2020
Two decades of EU market protection of ‘orphan’ (rare disease) medicines have greatly benefitted the industry. According to research by The Investigative Desk, published in the British Medical Journal (BMJ) and the Dutch Journal of Medicine (NTvG), many of these ‘orphan medicines’ make billions of euros.
Twenty years ago, the European Commission introduced a legislation to make the development of ‘orphan medicines’ – for the treatment of rare diseases – more attractive. Pharmaceutical companies would be awarded ‘market exclusivity’, not to be confused with patent protection, giving them a de facto 10 years monopoly on sales. The Investigative Desk analysed global sales data of 120 (of a total of 174) orphan medicines registered in the EU in the past 20 years. We found that pharma companies have reaped billions of euros on orphan sales.
This summer, the European Commission is expected to publish an – as yet confidential – review which suggests that without market exclusivity most of these medicines would have been launched anyway. These findings may raise voices for reform in the European Parliament.
The EU orphan legislation has stimulated the pharmaceutical industry to transform its ‘blockbuster’ model – which was based on medicines for widespread diseases – into a ‘nichebuster’ model in which medicines treating only small patient groups can still generate more than a billion euros annually. In 2019 alone, there were 20 such ‘nichebusters’ with an orphan designation in the European Union – up from 3 in 2009.
Since 2000, the average worldwide sales income of these orphan medicines has five folded to – on average – 723 million euros per medicine per year. Medicines for rare cancers are particularly lucrative, with an average turnover of 1.1 billion euros – twice the turnover of medicines for other rare diseases.
Experts say the excessive protection of orphan medicines is the result of flawed legislation. The European Commission cannot withdraw (or shorten) a market exclusivity once it has been granted – even if companies charge a disproportionately high price.
The complete findings of this research were published in the BMJ.
More investigations

Netherlands Health Council removes professor with ties to the liquor industry from advisory committee
Professor Joline Beulens, an internationally renowned lifestyle researcher working at the Amsterdam UMC, is no longer a member of the Health Council’s

Toxic Trains Dossier
This dossier is the result of a five months-long collaboration of five European journalists. Together, they investigated the transportation of ammonia

How the chemical industry doctored a new EU approval of a contested pesticide
There is growing evidence that glyphosate, the world’s most widely used weedkiller, carries serious risks for human health and the environment. Even s

This is the warning Big Alcohol wants to keep off your bottles of beer
Ireland was set to become the first EU country to put cancer warning labels on alcoholic drinks. But following a massive lobby campaign by Big Booze –

The hidden world behind illegal vapes
More and more Dutch young people are becoming addicted to vaping. This is not surprising, as illegal vapes with sweet flavors and excessive nicotine l

The Netherlands provides military resources to dubious regimes
Over the past decade, foreign trade ministers granted permits worth hundreds of millions for military exports to countries where there was a serious r