
Brussels pressured drug regulator to approve Pfizer vaccine
By Lucien Hordijk, | 22 January, 2021
Leaked documents show that the European Commission put pressure on the European Medicines Agency to approve the first Covid-19 vaccines simultaneously with the American FDA. This happened when the regulator still had serious questions about the purity of the vaccine.
According to the European Medicines Agency, in a press release issued on 15 January, confidential documents about the approval process were stolen by malicious hackers, who then manipulated them and distributed them online. EMA said the hack “could undermine trust in the vaccines”.
Despite repeated requests, the EMA has not provided any evidence to support the claim that the leaked documents were indeed manipulated.
The leak contains about twenty documents, which together amount to almost 900 pages. This includes traceable email traffic (including names, dates, time) from EMA’s executive management, confidential reports from scientific staff and presentations from Pfizer/BioNTech. All documents contain information about the authorization of the corona vaccine and are dated between mid and late November. During that time, EMA’s rolling review of the first vaccine was in full swing.
The documents show roughly two things. First, the EMA still had questions before it could approve the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine: a number of factories had not yet been inspected, some data on the vaccine were not available yet and the drug regulator had observed differences in quality of the active pharmaceutical ingredient between different batches of the vaccine. Second, the agency experienced strong political pressure from the European Commission to approve the vaccine as soon as possible.
Given the timeline, the EMA does not appear to have succumbed to this pressure. The British government approved the vaccine on 5 December and the American FDA on 11 December. The EMA issued a “conditional authorization” on 21 December, a week earlier than originally planned.
A spokesperson initially did not want to confirm or deny the authenticity. On Friday 15 January, the EMA issued a press release claiming the documents may have been tampered with. However, on Monday, 18 January, the spokesperson did not contest any citations from the leaked documents that we submitted for the purpose of this article.
Read the full article on FTM (in Dutch).
More investigations

Goliath vs. David: The race to the EU defense money
The war in Ukraine has unveiled a new threat to Europe’s security: Russia’s deployment of hypersonic missiles. With their unparalleled speed and maneu

The Investigative Desk Newsletter special edition July 2023
Read the full newsletter here. Dear readers, In this special edition we present you two major stories we just published. An international team,

Big Tobacco’s Beyond Nicotine Strategy
The past few years, the four biggest tobacco companies (Philip Morris International/Altria, British American Tobacco, Japan Tobacco International and

Why Europe is failing to provide Ukraine with sufficient ammunition
Since the February 2022 invasion, Ukraine’s five main military partners alone (US, Germany, UK, Poland, and the Netherlands) pledged more than 60 bill

The Investigative Desk Newsletter Q2 2023
Read the full newsletter here. Dear reader, This time, we bring you two stories and a book. Our editor Tim Luimes investigated the lobbying activitie

Chemicals lobby moves full steam ahead to undermine pfas ban
Europe wants to ban all pfas at once. The chemical industry is lobbying for the exemption of fluoropolymers. These substances, a type of plastics, are